Space tourism guide Brian Norton routinely augments the experiences of tourists with lighting tricks. The script is somewhat faithful to Dick's original story, but with the addition of a romantic sub-story, and with a more ambiguous ending. The story was adapted and directed by David Farr as an episode of the Channel 4/ Amazon Video anthology series Philip K. The four main characters take the journey to this inhospitable destination: the captain, his more ethical crew member, the old woman, and the woman's robotic servant. As Earth is believed to be a myth, the captain finds a record of a planet that is not called "Earth" but has one moon, and is in a star system of nine planets. The writer originally submitted it to the Scott Meredith Literary Agency on February 11, 1953, with the title "Legend." Plot Ī 350-year-old woman asks the captain of an interplanetary ship to take her to Earth. It was also published in Dutch, French, German and Italian translations. It has been reprinted over 30 times, including Brian Aldiss's 1974 Space Odysseys anthology. Dick, first published in the October 1953 issue of Imagination. " The Impossible Planet" is a science fiction short story by American writer Philip K.
PS: sorry for possible misspellings and that, Engrish is not my mother language."The Impossible Planet" was originally published in the October 1953 issue of Imagination. :)Īnd this answer in reverse (for other people): If you've read the novel you can give a chance to the movie, because the animation and some little differencies make it enjoyable without perverting the original idea. So I think that if you loved the movie you can give it a chance (or maybe you did it 2 years ago) to the novel, as it's a good way to complete some stuff exposed on the movie and you can read it in two or three days because is not a long book. Also, Luckman is pretty different, and Freck in the movie is the amalgam of various characters from the novel. Said that, I prefer the novel (I read the novel one day and watched the movie next day), because it goes beyond in some sequences, and made some passages more extended adding some interesting things, as for example with the scene of the bike gears, the car incident, or the part of New-Path, and some other stuff, including more philosophical thoughts of Bob/Fred, and, of course, more weirdo dialogues with the friends.
(view spoiler) [The movie is nice, specially for the rotoscopy animation, but is like a summary of the novel with some little exceptions and the variation on the plot twist.
0 kommentar(er)
